Loading images...
Twitter Feeds:

The Essence of Branding – Case Study of The Gap

The Essence of Branding and Rule #1 of Marketing – when you have a logo that people recognize and that’s successful – You don’t change it – That is the essence of branding!  Actually it’s a state of branding that many companies would do anything to have and honestly, very very few ever achieve.

Being branded takes many years and tens of millions of dollars to accomplish, if not more, but most importantly, once you are branded in the marketplace – it’s what separates you from the competition.  Especially from the knock off artists and others who are trying to ride on your coattails.

Case in point, you can walk down the aisle of any grocery store anywhere in the world and when you see a red 12 ounce can with white script lettering you instantly know it’s Coke.  Or if you see a dark blue can you instantly know it’s Pepsi.

The same goes for many top tier brands; Ford, Prada, Gucci, DKNY, etc etc.

I find it shockingly stupid and absurd that the current GAP management would consider changing it’s logo.  I could understand if the company was in deep financial trouble or on the verge of bankruptcy.

I believe there comes a point in a brand’s success or, as I like to call it, “character arc” or “progression” where the public is so vested in the brand, its success and instant visibility are assured.  The brand is always their choice.   Maintaining that vested commitment and recognition is the CEO’s and upper management’s sole purpose.  This is what I mean when I talk about “the custodian of the brand.”

That is, deliver what the buyer – who ultimately pays their check by buying the goods and services – wants.  Meaning: “if it’s not broke…. don’t fix it.”

In my opinion many CEOs don’t get this.  They come in with such bravado or arrogance, “I’m gonna change this and that and make my mark.”  What they don’t realize is that this company has been successful for a long time… much longer than they have been around and frankly their sole job is to continually deliver the goods and services on the level that “their” customer has been used to and pays for.

Again, Many CEO’s make the fatal mistake that they are going to cut the quality to save a few pennies and ultimately they make all the wrong decisions based on all the wrong indicators and alienate their loyal customers.  Why?  They truly don’t know and understand their brand.  Maybe it’s their ego, arrogance, lack of knowledge, experience, or in most cases their lack of vision.  Maybe it’s one of those out points or a combination of many.

Boots on the ground – For many CEOs probably the best thing, not to mention most humbling, is visit many of their stores – not just the flagships – and act like an unsuspecting customer and simply talk to their customers.  Find out what they truly like about the brand.  Again a major problem is that they instantly think they need to hire a focus group or some agency.  NOT.  They need to get out there and find the heartbeat of their brand!

One thing is sure, the focus should be simple.  You have built a brand over many many years and earned the very hard to achieve trust of your customers – your job:  Be the custodian of the brand and deliver what you customers have come to expect.  Therefore, if there is anything to focus on it should be management.  Yes, better managing of the brand and to further create exciting, engaging and/or better marketing ideas, plans and campaigns to expose/expand your brand to a greater audience.

All one needs to do is research the Old Spice campaign and experience the brilliance of how Old Spice reinvented themselves in the marketplace.  Also the Ford Fiesta Movement, which I was a part of.  There you can see how brilliantly Ford expanded into the sub-compact car market.

For a highly established brand like the GAP to even consider changing their logo sends up a huge management red flag.  How much money was wasted on this lame attempt to better something that was already great?  Even worse is what Ad Agency or Marketing Company in their right mind would even consider changing the GAP’s logo?  Stupid – flat out stupid.  Who ever they are…. In my opinon, I would highly question using their services!  They do not understand the essence of branding.  I find it laughable that a Consultant online would even try to justify and reason this failed attempt  – sounds like it’s time to clean house and look for new management.

Thanks to the power of Twitter and social media common sense has prevailed.  The outcry on social media sites has been staggering.  It’s hard to believe that it’s so obvious to the social media crowd but oblivious to the GAP Management.  Amazing.

Note to all other CEO’s and Branded Company’s take copious notes at the GAP’s expense.  Stick to managing…  isn’t that what you got that MBA for?

Branding Lesson #1 – If it’s not broke – don’t fix it.

53 Responses to “The Essence of Branding – Case Study of The Gap”

  • Wow man this great informative article…. I like the old GAP logo… Great work man

  • [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by joeygiggles, Sebastian St. George, Raine O'Keeffe, John C Davies, John C Davies and others. John C Davies said: RT @YogaArmy: The Essence of Branding – Case Study of The Gap http://bit.ly/criBjm *My 1st Blog @terrinakamura @Rootbrian_ @TheRealSh … [...]

  • John C Davies:

    Strong post. Branding is so important. “For many CEOs probably the best thing, not to mention most humbling, is visit many of their stores – not just the flagships – and act like an unsuspecting customer and simply talk to their customers.”
    This activity trumps any focus group recommendation. Talk to your clients where they are doing business. Ask ‘em. They’ll tell you. You just have to be prepared to hear the answers.
    -J

    • Sebastian:

      Wow John! Well said “be prepared to hear the answers”. Richard Branson is REALLY good at doing that. I ran into one of his employees in Vegas a few wks ago and he was telling me how Richard would go up and down the aisles before take off and talk to and shake his customers hands. He truly engages his customer base and they love him for it! Funny thing he had to tell Richard, Sorry Boss but we have to take off! LOL

  • I feel vindicated! I decided to put off branding until I had a clearer idea of how I wanted to portray the essence of my work. Two years ago, my cards said “EFT Psychotherapist” <– that is technically and academically accurate, but it doesn't come close to what I do and what effect I have on my clients.

    I was in a conversation with my business coach one day when he suddenly said, "so you're The Happiness Coach!" Voila!

    (Now, I need a logo!)

    Dr Deborah Barry
    The Happiness Coach

  • Awesome Post Sebastian!

    I would love to believe that GAP has planned this out as a major Social Media Marketing Campaign, Engaging the audience at both ends of the “like” continuum.

    The quick and what seemed to be, the appropriate response from the GAP leadership, leads me to suspect that this was planned out as a Social Engagement Campaign.

    As for the rest of us, you are right indeed, if we achieve a level of brand recognition that creates a positive cash flow, then we better think three times about “playing” with any of the components of that brand.

    Love your brand Sebastian: Luminous ROC

    • Sebastian:

      Great comments Daniel! I thought of that angle too but since it was so long I didn’t want to go into it. I am glad you mentioned it as yes I agree with you. There is a possibility they “decided” to work both angles. The thought of engaging in the dark side of this major Social Media Marketing Campaign is a very dangerous one indeed. One for a very skilled practitioner as it could have tremendous negative effects for the company. Furthermore, the GAP Management and other marketing people have made strange comments justifying their actions which continue to make people scratch their head. Thusly, it leads me to believe this strange engagement is not going to fare well for the company. I could be wrong and it could be spun in a good direction (with a lot of work). Honestly, they would have been better engaging the social media community and in the way of some type of design contest or something very fresh, out of the box with some stunning creativity.

      • Love it!

        A true case study!

        Let’s do indeed gather all the available public communications from the GAP leadership regarding this branding issue and see what specific lessons we all can learn and pass on to others. :-)

  • Chris:

    Hey man great stuff!

  • Great post. It dives right to the heart of this issue—that the move to discard an iconic logo was short sighted.

    Had the new logo been breakthrough and created positive buzz about the company, there could have been an argument for changing it, but the new logo is generic looking and completely obliterates the brand equity they’d worked so hard to achieve.

    I love how your voice comes through in the post. Looking forward to more :-)

  • Sebastian,

    As you know I have long been a proponent of the importance of branding and more important the importance of being true to your brand and remembering who and what go you where you are in the first place.

    A first rate article!

    In the future, I hope you write an article on how many larger companies and brands do not properly utilize social media and the new and unique ‘branding’ qualities the it lends itself to!

    Since we are all about to go where ‘no one has gone before’ I am glad I am going there with the likes of you!

    Keep up the great work!

    • Sebastian:

      Thank you San Dan Yi! Yes I plan on writing about those issues. This blog will be about all things passionate for Sebastian lol Whether it’s music, fashion, film, social media or esp. marketing/branding. As you know being a change agent and shooting from the hip we live on the precipice of creativity and pushing the limits. The rise of social media has come. It’s time for companies to properly utilize it and esp. the “people” who understand it!

  • great!!! work!!! love it!!!!

  • Most of these brands are reinventing themselves to keep up with the demands for higher quality and more ethical products. In doing so, these attempts to make a more creative logo is just making them lose popularity even faster.

    Great point, Sebastian! Very well done! Love the layout too!

    • Sebastian:

      Wow! Well said June and I couldn’t agree with you more! “to keep up with the demands for higher quality and more ethical products.”

  • Gaga:

    Sebastian,
    Thanks for sending me the link via Twitter DM to your first BlOG. It’s great and you need to keep your BlOG going. You have told the story of branding. Once while traveling in Alaska I was looking for a Starbucks, and while they weren’t on every iceburg they were there and I saw just a corner of the green logo and I knew in a 10th of a second that I had identified the Starbucks brand. Corporations would kill for that or at least pay millions and millions for years and years and and Gap gave it away. Passionate post.
    Gaga
    sometimes known as the logo nazi

  • Woohoo – great article to start the new blog off with. Strong and relevant :D . I never understand why folks mess with something they spent so much time/money developing in the first place. It’s called branding for a reason … you recognize it anywhere … if even flashed for a second in a movie – you recognize it for a reason. Dumb Dumb Dumb.

    That’s why it’s so important for us to make sure people understand what the brand means when they come to us for their website … it needs to be something they want to be with for many years to come … or … it SHOULD be at least. Some clients don’t listen.

  • michaeljmazzoni:

    Great Blog, and great start on Brands. Certainly got a lot of great comments and reviews. Bottom kine is tha

  • michaeljmazzoni:

    and to finish, Great products sell and poor ones do not. and BTW a bad keyboard should be replaced(LOL). Always love your ideas and approach, which will always make you a winner. Rock On , michael from Motown

  • [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Sandy, Tracy Durso and Sebastian, Daniel Stoica. Daniel Stoica said: The Essence of Branding – Case Study of The Gap http://bt.io/GBSM RT @yogaarmy [Like it? http://bit.ly/cbTPMU ] [...]

  • Gregg:

    Really good take from someone who has been at this kind of work a long time. Congratulations, too, on getting the blog up and running. I really like the way the whole page and material is put together. You do a great job of writing, too. Thanks!

  • I agree totally. It is almost like starting all over again and once you have a good name it is golden with consumers.
    Great article

  • I totally agree, Sebastian! Thank you for your knowledge. Powerful Insight!

  • [...] @gagasgarden recommended this debut post from Sebastian St. George (@YogaArmy) regarding the Gap branding fiasco. Show some support to a brand new [...]

  • nice post mate..you have given the example of coke and pepsi ;) here http://www.graphicdesignblog.org/pepsi-and-coca-cola-logo-evolution/ interesting link

    • Sebastian:

      Thanks Aniruddha for the cool link! I like it as I love studying stuff like that and tracking changes in corporate logos / branding. Pepsi and Coke are two of the Masters. Lots to learn there. Thanks!

  • Char:

    Speaking of branding, I’m beginning to recognize you from your own image! Yes, branding is a huge issue right now and definitely sets you apart from all the rest!!!

  • Brilliant insight! Great commentary. I really like your new branding; Luminous ROC!

  • BTW Great website layout! Keep up the great work. All of Us can’t wait to see what you do with this site and your next blogs! CHEERS MATE!

  • Sebastian

    I agree with you on the failure but yet a logo is not a brand. It is a visual aspect associated with the brand but it is not a brand. The brand is the message and like you said the CEO walking the store to talk to customers is about what they like about he brand would be characteristics of and the brand image the customer has developed. This is powerful information as have they accepted your message from what you told them and asked of them (to accept, adopt and trust) or have they developed their own image that is a different message that you need as a brand to consider. You have to think about talking the way the consumer talks so long as it does not destroy the brand.

    Where Gap failed is numerous places. Graphically they tried to simplify the logo to attract the younger crowd however they failed to consider the younger crowd who is photoshop savvy. The simplicity of the logo spoke to an older demographic who would relate to the helvetica font as it is in word. The younger generation is so not helvetica. Now they were introducing the 1969 Jean which is to the older crowd by name but had aspects tied to it that was attractive to the younger crowd (ie the recycling of old jeans for a coupon). They seemed to try and force the newness to 2 completely different demographics and it failed.

    It was not a stunt as if it was, then we would have seen a shift from the logo to the 1969 Jean campaign. They went quiet and so did all of us.

    As far as the agency, they are a very well respected group that maybe just gave the client what they wanted but in doing that they compromised their artistic ability.

    In the end, the Gap learned a very hard lesson that people are paying attention and that the online community is strong and you fed us but then took it away when you could have given us side dishes with the the new campaign.

    @SuzanneVara

  • Sebastian:

    Thank You Suzanne! Great comment and you bring up some awesome and very valid points. I really love how this blog has opened up the floor to a great discussion. I am so grateful to Everyone for the great comments!! Thank You!

  • Roger Baron:

    Awesome blog! Right on the money. Great analysis. I look forward to more of your blogs!

  • Terry McGuinn:

    Fantastic and much needed fresh perspective Sebastian. The advertising Biz needs your kick in the ass! Bravo!

  • Frankie K.:

    Great blog Sebastian! When are you doing your next?

  • Trevor Steig:

    Like it, good stuff, great perspective!

  • Steve McGuinn:

    Sweeeeeeeeeeet site!!!!!!!

  • Marketing Man:

    Sir you nailed it. Spot on in every way. I wouldn’t be surprised if they hire you LOL

  • Bob Victoria:

    Solid article. Engaging. I give it 5 stars.

  • Paul Godson:

    I thought this was a fantastic blog, not only great writing but it has a great layout, well done!!!

  • Raylene:

    Fantastic wordpress blog! The layout is fresh and your content is crisp. BTW The GAP should hire you!!!!!! By the read of this article they could do quite well by consulting with you!

    It’s hard to find quality writing like yours these days. I really appreciate people like you! Take care :)

  • Great blog with a sharp and fresh perspective. I look forward to your next ones.

  • Roger G. ESQ.:

    Why do Fortune 500 Company’s always do stupid shit like this?!?!?! WTF Really what the F is wrong with management? They should all be fired. Clean house!

    Didn’t they learn anything at Fordham? Or whatever lame ass business school they paid 150k for an MBA.

    This blog just cleans their clocks. Fail for the GAP. What morons! :(

    Hey they could have listened to your blog and saved themselves a boat load of grief. GAP = FAIL

  • Teddy Wilson:

    Excellent article. I found it off a google search by accident and I’m glad I click on the link. This is the first time I actually read an entire blog and this is a long one but it sucked me. So props to you Sebastian. Great writing. You have a new fan!

  • GAP SUCKS:

    Great article indeed. The GAP sucks and honestly I don’t shop there but obviously the Exec’s there are completely stupid. Yeah LOL they should read your blog but hey they won’t so blindly arrogant and have their heads so far up their asses. Yeah it’s typical white collar stupidity – Great going GAP. And for your next act you will do……….. ?

  • GAP SUCKS:

    I’ll say it again. Yeah they suck. Like that’s no surprise but hey now the cat’s out of the bag and everyone knows LOL

  • J. Stevens:

    Fantastic blog, well said and written. You should talk about other company’s and how they have positioned their brands. Your perspective is fresh. Please share some more!!!!!

  • Bill_Zarian:

    Superb blog entry. I would greatly love to read more of these blogs and would love to talk to you about consulting with my company. Excellent and well verse marketing perspective. Please email me sir. Thank you.

  • [...] is Sebastian blogging about Blackberries?  This is supposed to be a blog about Tech, Social Media, Branding and Marketing only. LOL Luminous ROC has become more about all things Luminous and especially topics and [...]

  • StvCll76:

    Looking forward to more of these blogs!

  • [...] – I was so excited to receive this huge package from FedEx today.  A big Thank You to Vladimir Kush [...]

Leave a Reply

CommentLuv badge

Subscribe without commenting

Subscribe:
Tags: